Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Holland 1981
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Miss Holland 1981 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established, only article relating to "Miss Holland". Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball 11:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment: Assessment of sources in the article:
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
http://misshollandnow.com/miss-holland-1981/ | value not understood | value not understood | ✘ No | |
http://lempimissit.suntuubi.com/?cat=328 | value not understood | Free website of indeterminable authorship | value not understood | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
—swpbT 16:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Miss Holland 1981 is already listed in the Miss Nederland article. There is nothing to indicate notablity about this particular instance of this particular pageant, and certainly no reason to list the runners up. nerdgoonrant (talk) 03:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - sources are unreliable and add nothing to the article's case for meeting WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT. DrStrauss talk 22:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.